Material quantity variance definition

Material quantity variance definition

If your business makes fancy bow ties, the direct material is silk, for instance. The Material Cost Variance (MCV) compares the standard cost that a business pays for the direct materials it consumes as part of its production to the business’s actual cost of those direct materials. Use the following information to calculate direct material quantity variance. A material quantity variance points to a lack of efficiency during the manufacturing process. If it’s not because of defective materials, look into how your factory workers are trained.

  1. As with direct material and direct labor, it is possible that the prices paid for underlying components deviated from expectations (a variable overhead spending variance).
  2. These factors can encompass elements such as material wastage, inconsistencies in production processes, shifts in material quality, and discrepancies in inventory management practices.
  3. A total variance could be zero, resulting from favorable pricing that was wiped out by waste.
  4. Standard costs provide information that is useful in performance evaluation.

We’ll discuss this in detail later, but companies that use the standard costing system to value their inventory correct their inventory account balances with the materials quantity variance. The materials quantity variance is one of several cost accounting metrics that manufacturers review to measure manufacturing efficiency. Keeping an eye on variances helps manufacturers identify and remedy issues as they crop up.

Direct Material Variances

Following is an illustration showing the flow of fixed costs into the Factory Overhead account, and on to Work in Process and the related variances. For instance, rent is usually subject to a lease agreement that is relatively certain. Even though budget and actual numbers may differ little in the aggregate, the underlying fixed overhead variances are nevertheless worthy of close inspection. The total direct labor variance was favorable $8,600 ($183,600 vs. $175,000).

Do you own a business?

The following illustration is intended to demonstrate the very basic relationship between actual cost and standard cost. SQ and SP refer to the “standard” quantity and price that encumbrance accounting was anticipated. In this case, the actual price per unit of materials is $6.00, the standard price per unit of materials is $7.00, and the actual quantity purchased is 20 pounds.

This is a favorable outcome because the actual price for materials was less than the standard price. Angro Limited, a single product American company, employs a proper standard costing system. The normal wastage and inefficiencies are taken into account while setting direct materials price and quantity standards. Variances are calculated and reported at regular intervals to ensure the quick remedial actions against any unfavorable occurrence. In this case, the production department performed efficiently and saved 40 units of direct material. Multiplying this by the standard price per unit yields a favorable direct material quantity variance of $160.

In this case, the actual quantity of materials used is 0.20 pounds, the standard price per unit of materials is $7.00, and the standard quantity used is 0.25 pounds. This is a favorable outcome because the actual quantity of materials used was less than the standard quantity expected at the actual production output level. As a result of this favorable outcome information, the company may consider continuing operations as they exist, or could change future budget projections to reflect higher profit margins, among other things. Like direct materials price variance, this variance may be favorable or unfavorable. If workers manufacture a certain number of units using a quantity of materials that is less than the quantity allowed by standards for that number of units, the variance is known as favorable direct materials quantity variance.

Would you prefer to work with a financial professional remotely or in-person?

Direct materials move from raw materials to work in process (WIP) to finished goods as they’re transformed into saleable products. Don’t immediately blame inferior raw materials or your factory workers for an unfavorable materials quantity variance. When you calculate the variance, you’re comparing actual material usage to what you expected.

If that doesn’t help you understand what went wrong to cause a variance, stop here. The Material Cost Variance allows companies to see whether the cost that they have incurred for direct materials is more or less than the standard cost of those direct materials. The material quantity variance is also known as the material usage variance and the material yield variance.

Comparing this figure ($125,000) to the standard cost ($102,000) reveals an unfavorable variable overhead efficiency variance of $23,000. However, this inefficiency was significantly offset by the $20,000 favorable variable overhead spending variance ($105,000 vs. $125,000). Note that there are several ways to perform the intrinsic variance calculations. One can compute the values for the red, blue, and green balls and note the differences. Or, one can perform the algebraic calculations for the price and quantity variances.

Unearthing the root causes allows them to make informed decisions, initiate corrective measures, and optimize material utilization practices. Each bottle has a standard material cost of 8 ounces at $0.85 per ounce. Calculate the material price variance and the material quantity variance.

Materials Shortage

If actual cost exceeds standard cost, the resulting variances are unfavorable and vice versa. The overall labor variance could result from any combination of having paid laborers at rates equal to, above, or below standard rates, and using more or less direct labor hours than anticipated. Standard costs provide information that is useful in performance evaluation. Standard costs are compared to actual costs, and mathematical deviations between the two are termed variances. Favorable variances result when actual costs are less than standard costs, and vice versa.

If the original standards are not accurate and fair, the resulting variance signals will themselves prove quite misleading. In this illustration, AH is the actual hours worked, AR is the actual labor rate per hour, SR is the standard labor rate per hour, and SH is the standard hours for the output achieved. The first step in the calculation is to figure out how much stuffing material should be used to manufacture 9000 teddy bears (standard quantity). A Material Price Variance may occur for a variety of reasons, such as a rise in price, changes in transportation expenses, size of the order, or the quality of materials being purchased, among others. A discount is to be retroactively applied to the base-level purchase price at the end of the year by the supplier, based on actual purchase volumes.

If the standard is excessively generous, there will be a long series of favorable material quantity variances, even though the production staff may not be doing an especially good job. Conversely, a parsimonious standard allows little room for error, so there is more likely to be a considerable number of unfavorable variances over time. Thus, the standard used to derive the variance is more likely to cause a favorable or unfavorable variance than any actions taken by the production staff. One must consider the circumstances under which the variances resulted and the materiality of amounts involved. For example, buying raw materials of superior quality (at higher than anticipated prices) may be offset by reduction in waste and spoilage.

Ask a Financial Professional Any Question

It evaluates how effectively materials get utilized during manufacturing. The material quantity variance considers actual and standard measures for a specific production level. As you’ve learned, direct materials are those materials used in the production of goods that are easily traceable and are a major component of the product. The amount of materials used and the price paid for those materials may differ from the standard costs determined at the beginning of a period. A company can compute these materials variances and, from these calculations, can interpret the results and decide how to address these differences. Ignore how much you actually paid for raw materials; we’re just trying to quantify the actual vs. expected quantity.

A material quantity variance of zero means the company uses the same quantity of materials as its established standards. However, that is rarely the case as this variance might be above or below zero. Material variance is the difference between the actual cost of direct materials and the expected cost of those materials. Standard direct material usage refers to the amount of materials allowed to be used per unit produced. In a multi-product company, the total quantity variance is divided over each of the products manufactured.